human rights

June 13, 2008

On empathy and imagination (with thanks to J K Rowling)

A little over a year ago I tried to put into words here some thoughts I had on empathy and imagination and what they had to do with activism for human rights and social justice. What I managed to say was:

"Ultimately, though, I believe that the strongest motivator for the defense of human rights is ... empathy. It is because I can imagine how it might feel to be a Palestinian mother who watched her child die because the ambulance carrying him to the specialised hospital in the West Bank was not allowed to pass an Israeli checkpoint that I feel compelled to work towards securing the right to freedom of movement for her and for everyone else. It is because I can imagine how it might feel to be an Algerian asylum seeker in New Zealand, labeled a security risk by the central intelligence agency but unable, even through my defense lawyer to see the basis on which I am accused of being such a risk, that I feel bound to do what I can to defend the right to a fair trial and a defense for him and for everyone else."


Today I watched the commencement speech that the amazing J K Rowling gave at Harvard University. I know it has been emailed and posted in various places, for good reason. It came to me from Blue Poppy, via Swirly. So I took a break from studying about how community psychologists should be committed to working with oppressed people to help achieve their goals for liberation and watched this video.

She puts it so well and I was not expecting it. Although I probably should have been expecting it, her Harry Potter books explore complex themes of marginalisation and social justice, including a fairly intense exploration of racism and xenophobia through the device of the "mud-bloods". But I wasn't. I under-estimated her and expected a speech about how important imagination is to the creative act. Which it is, of course. But she goes on to talk about how that creative act, the ability to imagine, lies at the heart of what makes us human. We, apparently unlike all other species, can imagine what it might be like in someone else's shoes and based on that creative act of imagining we can feel empathy. 

What I said in May last year was that I didn't believe that empathy was a "static quality that we are either born with or without. I think we can generate empathy, I believe we can cultivate the quality of empathy within ourselves."

I also had some ideas about how to generate empathy - they included a certain kind of travel and releasing ourselves to the transformative power of literature, art and film. I think those are still great tools for generating empathy. In fact my very next post was an exercise in using the creative power of poetry to cultivate the moments of powerful empathy that I experienced in day-to-day life in Afghanistan. But what I have been also learning, over and over again. Is the power of the simple practice of letting go, through seated meditation or whichever practice works for you, and revealing our natural warmth, compassion, imagination and empathy. 

March 04, 2008

Gaza

I've written here before about the two years when I lived in the Gaza Strip, working at the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights. So it won't be a suprise to anyone who knows me that the killing of so many Palestinians this past weekend has filled me with grief, anger and despair.

If (not suprisingly) your local or national media hasn't been covering the massacre in Gaza in much detail then read Laila's post about it here

Read Heba's post here

Read a joint blog by a Palestinian and Israeli man (Peace man and Hope man) here

Read what Jews sans Frontieres have to say over here

Or read Tara's post here

Or just look around the internet for some independent news sources (if your news is anything like ours here in New Zealand you won't find much of the story by reading the papers or watching the television).

I can't ever get used to the way that the world allows this kind of killing to carry on in Gaza without raising our combined voices against it. Today I feel that cloud of guilt hovering in the corner of my sky.

After living and working there for two years I left Gaza. I left my friends and colleagues to carry on the fight. I came home to New Zealand to devote four years of my life to strengthening my ties with family and friends and to developing the "New Zealand Action Plan for Human Rights".

Because we all know how much New Zealanders need my passionate defense of their rights, right? Or maybe not. Sigh.

Actually I do believe that working for the better promotion and protection of human rights in my own country is an important part of my life work. There are too many people here in New Zealand who are denied access to their rights. Children live in poverty in New Zealand. Maori land rights (indigenous rights) continue to be violated. Disabled New Zealanders face daily discrimination, as do trans-gender and inter-sex New Zealanders. Refugees and migrants face racism as they try to find work and accomodation. There was work for me here, but it was hard to leave Gaza.

It was just as hard as it has been to leave Afghanistan. Maybe even harder. I was younger.

For the first few years after I left Gaza I tried to remain politically active on Palestinian rights. But the barrage of emotional attacks I sustained from people who misunderstood my passion for the lives and basic rights of Palestinians took a toll. I couldn't summon up the energy to argue with people who had already formed their firm opinions on the basis of news headlines.

I looked for ways to support my Palestinian friends and colleagues without having to have pointless and emotionally exhausting arguments with people who have never stepped a foot in Israel or the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Ultimately I think I have failed to find the right path for me and during my two years in Afghanistan I wrapped all my passion for Palestine up in a ball and tucked it away in the back of my mind.

I let Afghanistan consume me and comforted myself with the thought that whilst I might be failing my Palestinian friends I was doing the best I could in Afghanistan. Hey - how much can one girl do?

But coming home and letting Afghanistan's grip on my heart ease just a little has allowed room for my love for Gaza to come flooding back in and along with it this desire to find a way to do more.

So here I am again. Knowing full well that my guilt won't help anyone and that I can make a difference here, in some small way today I'll find a way to show my support for the right of people in Gaza to live in peace, security and freedom. Maybe writing this post was the first step.

November 30, 2007

16 Days

Sadats_wife_with_the_washing

The wife of my colleague agreed to let me take her photo this week on the condition that her face was obscured. She was shy, but still friendly to a strange woman who turned up outside her house trying to speak Dari to her even though she only speaks Pashtu. Duh

This week I've been emotionally triggered what feels like a thousand times a day. I'm heading into my very last week in Ghor and my emotions are heightened, but the events of the week were fairly intense anyway.

Between last Friday and today the good people of Ghor have experienced tribal conflicts in Shahrak which had in the preceeding week culminated in an ambush on a police convoy killing the District Chief of Police and at least five of his soldiers, plus two tribal elders in the vehicle with him. The police this past week set out to rescue three men abducted in the ambush. Officially this rescue was to recover police officers but according to some local sources they were armed men from one tribe who had been travelling with the police to carry out attacks on the other tribe's villages. In any case the police operation seems almost certainly to have been complemented by reprisal attacks from the other tribe which were either ignored or actively supported by the police.

I don't know what kinds of feelings are generated in you when you read this kind of report. Pema Chodron talks about the reversion to numbness in the face of an overwhelming sense of helplessness. That seems to be a common response in much of the world, and understandably so. As for me I feel angry and sad at the same time about these events, and yes, I feel some hopelessness.

The week went on. This week was the first week of the international campaign "16 Days of Activism to Eliminate Violence against Women" (let's just say "16 days" from here on in, huh?). In my part of the world this week was marked by a grenade attack on the home of the Head of the Department of Women's Affairs, a grenade attack on the home of the female Provincial Prosecutor, renewed death threats against another woman holding a position of public office and rumours about the Head Teacher of the Girls High School.

I struggle to know what to do with the sadness and anger that is generated by these attacks. The morning after the first grenade attack I was at her house, and she was calmly showing me where the windows where smashed, where her car was damanged and where she shot a bullet into the door of her own car as she grabbed a gun and fired wildly in response to the attack. She took calls as we talked and thanked me for coming to see her and she asked me how my trip to America was - she herself having just returned from a trip away. I watched her and tried to learn from her how to behave under these circumstances.

Three days later she called me to her office, asking me to come alone and therefore without a translator. I went and we struggled to understand each other but in the end I got the point. She wanted to know what I was doing to push the police to find the person who attacked her. She was insisting that I should personally do more. My reaction? Not anything I'm proud of. I was overcome with a wave of anger.

It was anger born out of frustration because I have been meeting the responsible security officials, I have been exhorting them to do everything they can to find whoever is doing this, but they look me straight in the eye and tell me whatever they think I want to hear and I know that these meetings are achieving nothing.

So was I really angry at her for asking me to help? Of course not.

I was angry at the people who threw the grenade in the first place, for not having the courage and the decency to come out and publically speak their minds rather than sneaking around at night throwing grenades, putting children at risk and terrorizing those people in this town who are standing up for what they believe in.

I was angry at the Chief of Police for not putting an end to this - in a town of 10,000 people I cannot believe that it is impossible to find and arrest the person who has carried out five such attacks in the past month.

I was angry at myself for being so entirely useless in these circumstances.

I was angry at the journalist who had been visiting for two days, giving the impression that Afghanistan and it's stories of grenades and improvised explosive devices was a great lark, a 'boy's own adventure'.and who seemed disinterested and distracted from the real stories all around him.

For several days I allowed all these triggers to feed the angry, despairing wolf and by Wednesday as I sat in a special ceremony to mark the "16 days" I was on the verge of tears the whole time.

I was aware of the young Lithuanian soldiers patrolling the perimeter on foot specifically because I was here. Because by standing alongside the Head of Women's Affairs to give our speeches at this occassion I was now putting myself at risk of grenade attack. I thought about the risk that this entailed for those young men and I thought about their families at home.

I thought about why I needed to be at the ceremony and about all the other people who had agreed to come and stand up for women's rights. The Deputy Governor, one of the local Mullahs, the Head of the Provincial Council, the Head of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission. I thought about the people who, by sneaking about at night and throwing hand grenades, were trying to undermine all that this ceremony stood for.

I watched five young girls sing a song based on the Convention for the Elimination of Discrimination against Women and I wondered which one of them might be killed, maimed, beaten, raped or tortured in the years to come. I watched five beautiful boys stand up along side those girls and participate in a battle of the genders quizz. And I thought about which of those beautiful boys would end up hating his life, beating his wife, consumed by anger and hopelessness.

I know! Great thoughts for feeding the despairing wolf right, right?

Finally when the ceremony was over I came home and let myself have a good cry. I just let the anger and the sadness wash out of me.

When the crying was over I wrote. I wrote for myself, I wrote to the journalist, I wrote to friends who would understand and share with me in the pain. I wrote out the anger. I wrote to the other side. Sometimes, for me, writing is what I can do when I am too filled with emotion to sit in meditation. Sometimes writing is what I need to do first.

Then I sat, and I tried to get in touch with my natural openness, my natural warmth, my natural intelligence. Here are some of the things that came up for me:

Maybe the journalist was not callous and shallow. Maybe he was out of his depth and a bit overwhelmed. Maybe the sarcastic humour was a cover for confusion or even fear. Maybe the distracted twitchiness was not because he found the people around him uninteresting but because he didn't know where to look first, he didn't know who to talk to or what to make of it all. Maybe a little more kindness from me would have made all the difference.

I have to confess I didn't get quite that far with the guy(s) throwing the grenades. But I did find myself much less overwhelmed with emotion everytime I thought about them.

When I think about how hard it is for me to deal with all these emotions I have to stop for a moment and give respect to the people who are more directly affected by all these events. If it takes me a week to figure out how to stop reacting to the triggers and get back in touch with my basic goodness and my belief in the goodness of others then what does it take for the families in Shahrak whose fathers, brothers, sons were killed in the ambush? What does it take for the women whose homes have been attacked by grenades in the night, scattering deadly shards of glass across the room where their children sleep?

In these moments the cycle of violence makes sense to me, and I find myself coming back to the drawing board about how I can make my small contribution to peace in these times of war.

August 28, 2007

On the run

Sunset_in_ghor
Sunset in Ghor, August 2007

I'm due in the office in 30 minutes and then I'll be on the run until I fly out on Thursday morning so this is a post on the run.

Please go to Raising Yusuf Unplugged: Diary of a Palestinian Mother. Read Laila's post about the Lifemaker's Centre in Rafah, Gaza Strip and consider whether you would like to support this project, which provides after school care and play time for children in Rafah. Many of these children are severely traumatised. It really doesn't matter what you stance is on the politics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, this is a project to which you could donate whatever your stance, helping these children recover from trauma and discover their creativity and sense of possibility is a critical contribution to a peaceful future. One of my best friends and my neighbour for the two years I was in Gaza was a Scottish artists who did art therapy with kids in Rafah and Khan Younis and I beleive to this day it was amongst the most important work I saw in Gaza.

Tomorrow I'm running a workshop for all the key stakeholders in relation to violence against women and women's access to justice in Kabul - on my way out for leave. This includes Afghan government officials from the Ministry of Women's Affisrs, the Attorney General's Office, the Ministry of Interior and the Elimination of Violence Against Women Ministerial Task Force. It will also include UN agencies like UNAMA, UNIFEM, UNHCR, UNDP and UNICEF. There will be experts and passionate advocates, people who have seen it all and people who think nothing will work. My job is to facilitate a discussion which will, hopefully lead to an agreed set of priority areas for intervention, a matrix of who is doing what where and some direct suggestions for my agency which has agreed to take on a national project in this sector next year tasking me to design it. I'm excited and nervous and am looking for your top tips for getting all the key players on-board with new projects and then keeping them.

A few weeks ago I made my decision to stay an extra five months until the end of December, at the time it felt scary and I wondered why my heart was telling me to do this, when my wobbly fearful mind was so unsure. Three weeks later I'm absolutely on fire at work, I feel as though I have finally hit my stride in a number of projects and there is no doubt in my mind that staying was right for me. My heart knew it at the time, but my head and my stomach were not convinced. Sometimes I have to trust, take brave steps and know that if I am following my heart then the rest of me will eventually follow. Now I have decided to study next year I have a whole series of new decisions to make (keep working and study part-time and by distance, or leave the field and study full-time on campus, and if so which campus?). But I know that eventually I will know which option is right for me - my heart will know first and the rest of me will come around eventually.

On Thursday I'm off, stopping by Stef in London on my way to see Susannah for a weekend then off to Portugal for a week. When I get back I have a mission from a human rights and police expert in herat for three days, then I'm flying back up to Ghor with not one but two special missions, one to train the Department of Women's Affairs staff to interview women victims of violence and record their cases in a standardised form. The other is to conduct the survey of the children currently using the orphanage - so that the new children's centre can meet their needs better.

It will be a busy and exciting three weeks and I don't know how often I'll get here. Or over to your places. But there will be a great flutter of photographs and posts as soon as the dust settles!

May 05, 2007

Empathy, responsibility and human rights

Image002

Journal page 25 April 2007, after a week in which 200 Iraqis were killed in one terrible day.

I hold an almost Kantian view that any human rights violation anywhere in the world affects everyone everywhere.

Near the end of my time living and working in the Gaza Strip the Al Aqsa Intifada started, at which point the rules of engagement for the Israeli Army seemed to shift slightly so that internationals in the line of fire (as I often was in my role of monitoring the impact on civilians of the clashes each day) seemed to be at more risk of being shot.

I became more acutely aware of the possibility that I wouldn't make it home and so I wrote a letter to my nephew for his first birthday explaining why I was in Gaza. I believed then and I believe now that defending the international standards agreed upon by nations as the minimum means of protecting human life and dignity is a duty that has no borders. I told my nephew that if those standards were not upheld in Gaza to protect Palestinian children and Israeli children then that would be one step closer to  him, and I wasn't going to wait until then to act.

The poem, "First they came" by Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) is one of the simplest and most emotionally evocative expressions of the pragmatic reasons for taking some responsibility for defending the human rights violations of other people. There are lots of different versions of the translation of of Niemoller's poem, but the one I prefer is this one:

First they came for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up,
because I wasn’t a Communist.
Then they came for the sick, the so-called incurables, and I didn't speak up,
because I wasn't mentally ill.
Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up,
because I wasn’t a Jew.
Then they came for me, and by that time there was no one left
to speak up for me

Ultimately, though, I believe that the strongest motivator for the defense of human rights is not a fear of "me next" but rather empathy. It is because I can imagine how it might feel to be a Palestinian mother who watched her child die because the ambulance carrying him to the specialised hospital in the West Bank was not allowed to pass an Israeli checkpoint that I feel compelled to work towards securing the right to freedom of movement for her and for everyone else. It is because I can imagine how it might feel to be an Algerian asylum seeker in New Zealand, labeled a security risk by the central intelligence agency but unable, even through my defense lawyer to see the basis on which I am accused of being such a risk, that I feel bound to do what I can to defend the right to a fair trial and a defense for him and for everyone else.

But I don't think that empathy is a static quality that we are either born with or without. I think we can generate empathy, I believe we can cultivate the quality of empathy within ourselves. I also have some ideas about how. I have always believed that a certain kind of travel, with an open mind and a spirit of respect, is one of the most powerful means for generating empathy for people who are very different from us in appearance and environment. I'm pleased to say that the great Mark Twain agrees with me, he said:

Travel is fatal to  prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness

But Mark Twain would presumably also recognise the power of literature to do the same thing. I have also always believed in the incredible power of the arts and the media to generate or mitigate empathy. The broader the range of lives, cultures, environments and experiences we absorb through the characters with whom we deeply identify in a work of fiction, the broader our capacity to empathise may become. It is not only in books that this happens, I think movies are perhaps even more influential today, they certainly have a wider distribution. It cannot be argued, for example, that the film "Rabbit-Proof Fence" was a catalyst in the national debate in Australia about the 'Stolen Generation'. Similarly, a friend of mine who works for the Ministry for the Environment in New Zealand told me in a recent email that the policy environment has become decidedly more conducive to getting environmental protection laws and policies passed since "An Inconvenient Truth" was distributed and got massive box-office returns in New Zealand.

In the context of all those rambling thoughts, I found this book review by Gary J. Bass (from The New Republic, although I got it through Powells.com review-a-day) of Lynn Avery Hunt's new book "Inventing Human Rights: A History", a fascinating read. Hunt shows the important role empathy played in the development of human rights standards, and more than that, she also shows the direct connection between literature and the growth of empathy. If you have any interest in the ethical debate about human rights standards, or in the relationship between literature and empathy then I highly recommend this review. Here is an extract I particularly enjoyed:

Whose lives matter to us? In principle, for the most austere liberals, there is no justification for preferring one human life over another one. "Because a...community widely prevails among the Earth's peoples," Kant remarked, "a transgression of rights in one place in the world is felt everywhere." John Rawls argued that we should choose society's main rules as if we did not even know which family or ethnic group we belong to. To a pure liberal, if people are dying in a quarrel in a faraway country between people of whom we know nothing, all that matters is that people are dying.

But the politics of this moral duty do not work that way. In real life, our ethical universe radiates outward from ourselves. Our own miseries are our first and foremost concern, even when they are relatively trivial. "If he were to lose his little finger to-morrow, he would not sleep to-night," Adam Smith wrote in Theory of Moral Sentiments. "But, provided he never saw them, he will snore with the most profound security over the ruin of a hundred millions of his brethren, and the destruction of that immense multitude seems plainly an object less interesting to him, than this paltry misfortune of his own." Virginia Woolf echoed this nasty thought with verve in Mrs. Dalloway, in which her sweetly dithering title character thinks this: "And people would say, Clarissa Dalloway is spoilt.' She cared much more for her roses than for the Armenians. Hunted out of existence, maimed, frozen, the victims of cruelty and injustice (she had heard Richard say so over and over again) -- no, she could feel nothing for the Albanians, or was it the Armenians? but she loved her roses." We all love our roses. And most of us love them a little guiltily, insofar as we recognize the narrowness of this emotional horizon. This guilt, or discomfort, is a mark of moral progress. At least Clarissa Dalloway feels bad that she doesn't feel bad.

I hope that will tempt you to go and read the rest. More on empathy tomorrow.

April 06, 2007

Friday ramblings: Muslim feminists, guidelines for peacekeepers and soy lattes

I have a kind of ritual for my Friday mornings (Fridays are the beginning of our weekend here). I wake early and do the following in no particular order: put on the coffee and heat soy milk for my morning latte, do my morning meditation, and spend at least a couple of hours reading emails and blogs. Then I make another latte and start to untangle all the thoughts and reflections that are crowding my mind - unwinding them into a post here.

So it is not surprising that my Friday morning posts tend to be crowded with ideas and this morning is no exception.

Home in Kabul got me thinking about Muslim women and feminism, this has been an discussion I've had with lots of Western feminists. I am really uncomfortable with the idea of Western women coming to the rescue of the oppressed Muslim woman. In my line of work it is easy to find examples of this kind of thinking. I particularly disliked the impact I noticed on Western women's perceptions of Muslim women and men of that spate of books that flooded the popular reading market a few years back - starting with "Not Without My Daughter". I would come home from my work in the Gaza Strip and find that women in the West wanted to hear about the terrible victimisation of Muslim women.

Then - soon after I left Gaza 9/11 happened and there was this other layer in it all. The message I saw everywhere I looked was of Arab and Muslim men as dangerous, violent, unpredictable and irrational. I am a Western feminist and it made me so uncomfortable, so angry - I can't imagine what it felt like for Muslim men and women.

I have only one very simple method for avoiding this kind of trap - it is to meet people, talk to people, to be open and ready to move very far from your comfort zone and to discover what the world looks like from a very different point of view. In Gaza and here in Afghanistan I don't want to do any work on "women's rights" without local women by my side - telling me their stories, sharing with me their analysis of the challenges and the ways forward. Ideally I also want lots of local men involved as well. After my recent post on Women's Day I think I need to take the opportunity here to point out that I have no problem finding Afghan men who want to work with me on projects and initiatives that will identify and try to remove the barriers preventing women from accessing their fundamental rights.

Of course I have prejudices and stereotypes, I bump into them all the time. I can only hope that by continuing to move away from certainty and a sense of my solid ground, by being always willing to move towards the questions and the uncertainties that I will also keep challenging those prejudices, and learning to let them go.

But wait - there is more from Home in Kabul - she also reminded me to go back and visit the weblog of Jan Pronk. I've posted here about Jan Pronk before, he was the UN Special Envoy to Sudan and amongst the Sudanese Government's complaints about him was the fact that he wrote about the situation in Sudan on his personal blog. His is an interesting story and you can read more about it in his own words, here. But the post that really got me thinking today was the one linked by Home in Kabul, where Jan Pronk lists 15 guidelines for peacekeepers.

Much of what he lists is common sense - 'International peacekeepers should respect their national colleagues, they know their own country better than we do', for example, and 'Delegate, trust your staff, work as a team'. This is fundamental and I don't think there is any way that anyone could get past step one in this kind of work if they don't really genuinely believe this, and act accordingly.

Some of what he says looks simpler on the surface than I find it to be in practice - 'Respect local cultures and traditions' for example seems to go without saying, except that some local traditions (in any setting, mind you, not only here in Afghanistan) are harmful to minorities or vulnerable groups. Child marriage is an obvious example. Finding ways to promote protection of child rights in communities where early marriage is a common and traditional practice is complicated and sensitive work - the best approach I know of is the point Jan makes above - respect your national colleagues, they are committed to the same human rights principles that you are AND they know their country so very much better than you do.

Some of his guidelines are more inspired - and resonate with my 'inner journey' - like:

10. Never be satisfied. There is no room for complacency, despite many achievements.

11. Insecurity, risk, uncertainty and political pressure are not a hindrance, but a challenge. They are no exceptions to a normal and stable pattern. They are not exogenous factors, but inherent to peacekeeping.

12. Fight bureaucracy. Fight also the bureaucrat in yourself. Stay a movement; keep the spirit of a pioneer.

13. Care for people. People first.

And finally -  the must recurrent message of my life these days and weeks:

15. Please, stay

March 26, 2007

U.N. calls for release of Afghan journalist

If you read my earlier post on this topic you'll understand why I'm pleased to read this press release from the United nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan today. I was feeling sceptical about whether the international community would maintain interest in this issue once the Italian journalist was released. This is somewhat reassuring, although the end result is yet to be seen.

U.N. calls for release of Afghan reporter held by Taliban

March 26 - The United Nations mission in Afghanistan called on the Taliban on Monday to release an Afghan reporter kidnapped along with an Italian journalist captured earlier this month in the country's south. (AP)

Ajmal Naqshbandi, a freelance reporter, was working as a translator for Daniel Mastrogiacomo of the Italian daily La Repubblica when they were kidnapped in Helmand province on March 5. Mastrogiacomo was released in exchange for five Taliban prisoners on March 19. His driver, Sayed Agha, was beheaded by militants.

Naqshbandi's family and journalist associations have demanded that militants release him. "We call upon those holding him to immediately release him and respond positively to the calls from his family, journalists, and many other Afghans who have called for his safe return," said Aleem Siddique, a U.N. spokesman. "Ajmal has no connection with either Afghan or international military forces," he said.

Italy pressed Afghanistan to meet the kidnappers' demands, leading to the release of the five prisoners, reportedly including two high-level Taliban - a former spokesman and the brother of the militia's top ground commander, Mullah Dadullah.

Afghan lawmakers, analysts and international workers have criticized the government's decision to release the prisoners for the Italian journalist and also for not securing Naqshbandi's release.

March 11, 2007

Women's Day Part III: It's not a Hallmark greeting card!

Marking International Women’s Day is a big deal in Afghanistan. You might think that this would be something that pleases me greatly. In theory it does. But in practice there is something quite unsettling, perhaps even disturbing about the approach taken to the day.

My discomfort began when the Head of the Department of Women’s Affairs in Badghis asked me if my organization could donate some money so that she could buy gifts to distribute to women on Women’s Day. I ask ‘which women?’ and ‘what kinds of gifts?’ It emerges that the gifts include flowers and sweets and go to the female employees of government departments, as well as to “poor women” from in the town. I ask around and am told that this gift-giving ceremony has been the primary women’s day event in Badghis for several years.

I don’t think that I’m ready yet to start toppling established traditions that involve the giving of gifts, if anything is likely to make me lots of enemies, fast, it would be that. So I don’t try to talk her out of the ceremony, but I do say that my organization would be more interested in supporting an event that addressed the theme of International Women’s Day this year, i.e. ending impunity for violence against women. Perhaps, I suggest, we could hold a round-table discussion on violence against women as a crime with representatives from the police, the prosecutor’s office, the courts, and the Department of Women’s Affairs. She claims she is interested, but in the end nothing comes of it.

My discomfort grows as my Afghan colleagues start congratulating me because my “day” is iminent. They joke that there should be a day for men as well. I cringe at the suggestion that this day is some kind of privilege for women. I try to discuss the point of the day in more detail, but it begins to emerge that although the day is widely celebrated, it is treated as a kind of non-romantic Valentines Day.

On the day I receive text messages of congratulation, online cards and even chocolates from Afghan colleagues who continuously “congratulate” me. I feel something decidedly impolite growing in me. What exactly, I wonder, are they congratulating me for? For the achievement of having been born a female, hardly a prize in a country where women are given in marriage in their childhood to men they don’t know, let alone like.

Perhaps they are congratulating me for having the good fortune not to have been born here? That would make more sense, except that they are also congratulating all the Afghan women on our staff as well.

It begins to dawn on me that I am being congratulated for getting this day – this one day in the whole year in which men in Afghanistan feel bound to acknowledge and in some way celebrate the women around them. Of course when I say men in Afghanistan I mean that small percentage of men in Afghanistan working in international organizations or some Government departments. It’s only going to last this one day so make the most of it, seems to be the message.

Some men even make jokes with me – ‘you are a human rights officer’, they tease, ‘shouldn’t we men also get our own day? Isn’t this discrimination?’. The not very polite thing that has been growing in me is taking form and now I recognise it, it is the angry Frida. Oh no, she is not very polite at all, and since I still have five official women’s day functions to attend in this city I ask her to stay where she is for the moment.

It wouldn’t really be fair, anyway, for my funny-guy colleague to bear the full brunt of her fury, since she has been growing stronger for a long time now, feeding on the cases I’ve been seeing of young girls sold in marriage to abusive husbands, and of young women imprisoned for running away from those very abusive marriages. This foolish young man may prove to be the final straw that broke the bonds that have been holding her back, but he doesn’t really deserve to take her full frontal attack. So I get her agreement to wait for the right moment to use all her energy and in the meantime head off to one of these formal ceremonies.

I am relieved that I don’t understand enough Dari to get more than the most general idea of what is being said, because I can make out enough to understand that the theme of most of the speeches is “the rightful role of the women in the family”. At the first ceremony there is not one peep about the theme of this year’s event, despite the widely reported high incidence of violence against women in Afghanistan. Grrr, growls angry Frida, more than a little bit pissed off that I got her to promise to hold herself back for this.

Fortunately things do get better. The next event I am invited to is a women-only event hosted by the Professional Council. The speaker line-up features some of my favourite women in Herat (a lawyer, a doctor, an engineer, a journalist, and a renowned chemist, no less). The speeches are feisty and unapologetic, and they encourage the young women in the audience to defy expectations and restrictions. They tell those young women to rise up and claim their rights, not to wait for anyone to hand them over.

In the second half I am sitting with a lawyer friend of mine, whose earlier speech had nearly lifted the roof, as we watch her beautiful daughter join the line-up of young models showing off a range of women’s wear, ranging from an extraordinary handmade Turkmen wedding costume to a surgeons scrubs.

But it was the final event I attended that moved me the most. It was organised by Aziza, a long-term activist for women’s rights in Herat and now the coordinator of a network of Afghan human rights organizations. She told me that she wanted to do something different, with no speeches, no big ceremonies, no gifts. Instead she arranged an exhibition of photos of the some of women who she admires in the city, women who were champions for the rights of other women.

The exhibition featured some very well known women like my friend the Chief Prosecutor, Maria Bashir, and the filmmaker Roya Sadat. Other women honoured in the exhibition included the principal of a local girl’s high school, a basketball player and the founder of a women’s radio station. It also featured some of the young artists of Herat, including a poet, and several painters. These young women were all at the opening and when I arrived they were still busy setting up a memorial to the one woman featured in the exhibition who was not there to enjoy it.

Her name is Nadia Anjama and she was a young poet and a student at the Faculty of Arts at the Univeristy of Herat. She died last year when her husband (a lecturer in the Faculty) beat her to death as a punishment for her insistence to attend a meeting with a visiting musician/artist. Here, finally, I found a space in which women were celebrating women for their courage, their gifts, their lives and the differences they made. Here also there were women unafraid to tell the other story of this day, the story of thousands of women killed every year as a result of domestic violence.

Tonight I went over the house of a new friend (yah for new friends in this town, especially new friends who want to practice yoga together, drink bottles of red wine and watch DVDs) to have a glass of wine and some pasta and watch “Little Miss Sunshine”. The film, by the way, is so good I might need to give it a post all of its own. After dinner she offered me some nougat she had been given as a gift on International Women’s Day. As we both grimaced at the thought of the flowers and greetings that seemed to have taken over most people’s understanding of the day, I remembered Aziza’s exhibition.

You know what – if you give women a day then it really doesn’t matter how much of a meal most people will end up making of it, there will always be some who find that open door (even if it is open just a crack) and make their way through it.

March 09, 2007

Can't stop the signal

Welcome to my new blog home. I finally decided to make the move and Ive already worked out how to use the delicious banner Boho Girl mad for me, despite my complete lack of technical know-how. So this is a happy house-warming so far, no interruption in service. Can't stop the signal, it seems.

Today I was feeling a little sorry that my post for International Women's Day yesterday was so grim. I was rushed and coming to the end of a long and busy week. It had been a week in which the commanders and gansters of this town were flexing their muscles. In response to the risk of injury to pride or reduction in power, these men are threatening to take steps which could further destabilise the whole area and put the lives of civilians at risk. The developments remind me of the times when I have seen these men come to the point of all out battle, and the outcome of that battle. When th guns had stopped blazing the body count included an estimated 20 victims who were children, under the age of 18 years. These children and their mothers pay the real price for the ongoing conflict, a conflict in which they have no real decision making voice or influence.

I was tired, and I wanted to talk about the theme of International Women's Day (ending violence against women and girls) to remind myself and anyone reading this blog of the extent of this violence and to encourage us all to take the action that is within our means. But when I read it this morning it seemed heavy-handed and impersonal. I wished I had taken the time to right something more nuanced.

Then the Commander and I spent a wonderfully lazy day today, inside watching DVDs. I finally finished the TV series "Firefly" so that I was allowed - after great build-up of anticipation - to watch the movie that was made to follow the series, "Serenity". The Commander is a huge fan of Joss Whedon and especially of Firefly and Serenity so I've been primed for these DVDs for over six months.

Serenity is a great movie for lots of reasons, but the point that stood out to to me today (given my doubts about posting a list of horrifying statistics about violence against women) was the tagline "Can't stop the signal". The key message of the movie was that it is worth fighting for what you believe in (nothing particularly innovative in that, perhaps) and that people have a right to know the truth, no matter how ugly that truth may be.

So today I'll take it from Joss Whedon, the truth needs to be told. We all have the right to make our decisions based on as much information as possible. The truth is that violence against women and girls is endemic around the world, there may be prettier ways to say it but we all have the right and the responsibility to choose how to use our time and our talents with a full knowledge of that truth.

So some days my posts will be grim, this is my place to speak so if you read here you'll get the full range of my reactions to the life I'm living. What makes it okay is that the truth encompasses so much more than the suffering, it is also true that there are all sorts of wonderful people and organisations working to reduce the suffering. It is also trues that spring is arriving with the promise of new life, new energy and even new hope.

Fortunately all these things are true.

International Women's Day

Today, 8 March, is International Women’s Day. The theme for this year is ending impunity for violence against women. Not surprisingly this is an issue about which I am fairly passionate. Here in Afghanistan the levels of violence perpetrated against women and girls is heartbreaking. Worse, the victims are almost entirely without any recourse to justice, protection or even an escape.
But as striking as the problem is here in Afghanistan, the women here are not alone. Women all over the world, including in New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States of America, are living with violence.

Some statistics about violence against women and girls:

  • Violence against women is the most common but least punished crime in the world.
  • Globally, women between the age of fifteen and forty-four are more likely to be maimed or die as a result of male violence than through cancer, malaria, traffic accidents or war combined.
  • At least one out of every three women has been beaten, coerced into sex or otherwise abused in her lifetime. Usually, the abuser is a member of her own family or someone known to her.
  • Domestic violence is the largest form of abuse of women worldwide, irrespective of region, culture, ethnicity, education, class and religion.
  • It is estimated that between 113 million and 200 million women are demographically "missing." They have been the victims of infanticide (boys are preferred to girls) or have not received the same amount of food and medical attention as their brothers and fathers.
  • The number of women forced or sold into prostitution is estimated worldwide at anywhere between 700,000 and 4,000,000 per year. Profits from sex slavery are estimated at seven to twelve billion US dollars per year.
  • It is estimated that more than two million girls are genitally mutilated per year, a rate of one girl every fifteen seconds.
  • Systematic rape is used as a weapon of terror in many of the world's conflicts. It is estimated that between 250,000 and 500,000 women in Rwanda were raped during the 1994 genocide.
  • Studies show the increasing links between violence against women and HIV and demonstrate that HIV-infected women are more likely to have experienced violence, and that victims of violence are at higher risk of HIV infection.

I find the thought of it overwhelming, this violence going on all around us all over the world. Violence against women is a crime, whether it is perpetrated by family or strangers, in the public sphere or behind closed doors, in times of peace or conflict.

States have an obligation to protect women and girls from violence, to hold accountable perpetrators and provide justice and remedies to the victims. I spend a lot of my working time to assist states to better fulfill this obligation, and holding them accountable when they do not.

But ending violence is not just the Government’s responsibility – everyone in society, men and women, has a responsibility to act when confronted with such violence.

Today on International Women’s Day I urge you all to take action to prevent this violence going unnoticed, unpunished and unhindered. Find a small step that you feel comfortable taking:


  • volunteer to train to be the contact point for women and girls in your office or school who have been bullied or harassed;

  • report the domestic violence going on in your apartment building to the police;

  • approach a domestic violence victim support organization in your community and ask for their suggestions;

  • make a donation to an organization working to help women who are recovering from violence in war-affected countries;

  • paint, draw, photograph or write about violence, or about ways to end or recover from violence.

I’m sure you’ll think of a hundred more ways to take action to end violence against women. Share your ideas and inspire others.

Labels: , ,